Go Back   Online Gambling Forum | Winner Gambling > Online Gambling > Online Casinos

Reply

 

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-05-2008, 05:36
Winnergambling's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,485
Thanks: 302
Thanked 119 Times in 107 Posts
Winnergambling is on a distinguished road
Exclamation *** Official Bonus Updates Thread ***

This thread is the current bonus updates thread (related to bonus listings at Winner Gambling instead of the old blog version of the site).

Post in this thread, if you notice outdated info about bonuses somewhere on the site, thank you!

Last edited by Winnergambling; 11-05-2008 at 07:18..
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-05-2008, 19:09
Advanced Gambler
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 369
Thanks: 18
Thanked 41 Times in 37 Posts
Peixinho is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Is it ok to just say the name and nothing else? That should be enough for people to read the T&C.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 13-05-2008, 15:23
Winnergambling's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,485
Thanks: 302
Thanked 119 Times in 107 Posts
Winnergambling is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peixinho View Post
Is it ok to just say the name and nothing else? That should be enough for people to read the T&C.
Well, if you notice the complete change it will help us to make changes on the website more efficiently.

There will be over 300 casinos (might be actually 400) and their bonuses listed on the opening site soon, so every drop of time we save on checking T&Cīs is appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 13-05-2008, 15:38
Advanced Gambler
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 369
Thanks: 18
Thanked 41 Times in 37 Posts
Peixinho is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Yes of course it's better if some info is written, but what I meant was is it better to say the casino name only or say nothing at all if these two are the options? There are situations when it's not clear what is changed due to poor english for example.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 13-05-2008, 15:42
Gambler
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 24
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
laitin is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Stan james no more red dog

For stan james SUB it is no more eligible to wager in red dog.

"the following games are excluded from forming part of the wagering requirements: All forms of Black Jack, all forms of Roulette, Baccarat, Casino War, Craps, Three Card Poker, Paigow Poker and Red dog."


What it could be the next best game to wager?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 13-05-2008, 15:50
Winnergambling's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,485
Thanks: 302
Thanked 119 Times in 107 Posts
Winnergambling is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peixinho View Post
Yes of course it's better if some info is written, but what I meant was is it better to say the casino name only or say nothing at all if these two are the options? There are situations when it's not clear what is changed due to poor english for example.
Well, better to say something I guess. However, spreading misinfo is not making any good. So if you are not sure, PM me for example, and Iīll check it out.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 13-05-2008, 15:54
Winnergambling's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,485
Thanks: 302
Thanked 119 Times in 107 Posts
Winnergambling is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by laitin View Post
For stan james SUB it is no more eligible to wager in red dog.

"the following games are excluded from forming part of the wagering requirements: All forms of Black Jack, all forms of Roulette, Baccarat, Casino War, Craps, Three Card Poker, Paigow Poker and Red dog."


What it could be the next best game to wager?
Casino Stud Poker (Caribbean Stud Poker at Wizardofodds). It has actually a bit lower house edge than Red Dog, but variance is significantly higher. Thatīs why Red Dog was better game earlier.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 13-05-2008, 17:46
Gambler
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 43
Thanks: 0
Thanked 24 Times in 18 Posts
axxu is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by laitin View Post
For stan james SUB it is no more eligible to wager in red dog.

"the following games are excluded from forming part of the wagering requirements: All forms of Black Jack, all forms of Roulette, Baccarat, Casino War, Craps, Three Card Poker, Paigow Poker and Red dog."


What it could be the next best game to wager?
Does this mean that video poker is allowed again?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 14-05-2008, 01:13
Winnergambling's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,485
Thanks: 302
Thanked 119 Times in 107 Posts
Winnergambling is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axxu View Post
Does this mean that video poker is allowed again?
Nice find - donīt know. Might be. Letīs wait a day or two.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 14-05-2008, 13:18
Advanced Gambler
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 163
Thanks: 15
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
Wakke is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Stan James:

"Finland is one of the countries that is excluded from our bonus scheme"

Live support said that Finland is excluded and it is in Terms and Conditions but I can't see it.

Last edited by Wakke; 14-05-2008 at 13:40..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:52.

custom design by Themes by Design

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0